So far, I have liked the book. It is reinforcing what I already knew; that students are becoming increasingly inadequate at reading. I find it hard to believe that this country and our schools are still sticking with measuring reading based on a mulitple-choice exam. I can't blame the teachers because if their students do poorly on the test then that means they can find themselves out of a job. It truly is a decision to make: raise reading scores and kill a love for reading OR teach kids to read and enjoy it and don't worry about the multiple-choice test scores. Some students simply are not good test takers.
I was fortunate enough to not have to deal with any end of course tests or reading exams. Since I was in private school, we were encouraged to read what we wanted to, across many genres. Teachers encouraged students to try new authors and when we did have to read a book as a class, it was based on discussion and essay style answering. Very few quizzes we took had any multiple choice questions on it.
I really liked the part where Gallagher said that teaching toward the test is a good thing, if done correctly. When I begin teaching, I really like the idea of giving the students the final question/goal of understanding for the reading. A teacher probably will not be able to cover all of the standards asked of them, but I believe some standards are more important than others and more time should be spent on them. I do plan to incorporate more reading into my science classrooms, and maybe that will help them out on reading scores, but more importantly in reading comprehension.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

Your teachers gave you a gift, Paul, of encouraging you to read widely. I think it will be a great benefit for your student is you find ways to include reading in your science curriculum. From my experience, when students get really interested in science, they do want to read and learn more about it.
ReplyDelete